Endorsement of the RH Bill by ADMU professors still reverberates in the news today. A fellow Ateneo alumni defended such act simply as a reflection of the academic exercise in Jesuit education. He said, we consider all sides of the story.
I can certainly relate with everything he said. I have vivid memories of classroom discussions in my days under Jesuit instruction that drew from each one of us what we were thinking, rather than what we were perceiving, without necessarily being constrained by any perspective. Opposing opinions were welcome because it was part of refining our understanding of the subject and the lines that mark the difference between Church teaching and what the world teaches.
In a sense, academic freedom applies to the present debates about the RH Bill. But in a bigger sense, it does not. Let me tell you why.